From: iz
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 4:26 PM
Post by izWhy cannot GiP get a podcast for which I have the pid and can play on my pc?
Your clip is only available in Flash format, which GiP doesn't support.
This is unrelated to podcasts. Your clip was a promo item, not a podcast
episode. GiP can download the actual >podcast episodes.
You can download it with get_iplayer v2.99 and --tvmode=flashvhigh provided
you kept a copy of rtmpdump.exe when the installer removed it.
You can also get .mp3 podcasts and .pdf transcripts of all four of the
Astronomer Royal's 2010 Reith lectures at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00sk5nc
Earlier I suggested using VLC to convert it, but I have since found that
does not work.
I had a surprising amount of difficulty playing the clip in Firefox. I
started with Ubuntu and Firefox Quantum 57.0.1 and did not manage to run it.
I then booted into Windows 10 and Firefox 57.0.2. It only played after I
had re-installed Flash. When I got home I tried it on my main machine with
Windows 10. Before I did I had allowed Firefox 57.0.2 to be updated to
57.0.3. This time re-installing Flash was not enough. I tried the steps on
Adobe's website, to no avail. There was just a a message telling me I
needed Flash, but no pop-up by which I could allow it to be run. I did a
fair amount of searching and reading before I found from
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Plugins/Flash_Activation:_Browser_Comparison
that there was an icon in the location bar I could click. (I did not get
the in-page UI.)
Adobe's and Mozilla's plans are set out here.
https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2017/07/25/firefox-roadmap-flash-end-life/
I shall have to think about reverting to the Firefox v52 Extended Support
Release.
The Times has recently started including video clips. So far I have been
unable to play them. I don't know if they are using Flash. I do not know
enough to be able to tell from a web page whether it is using HTML5 or
Flash.
As for b and p PIDs, I remember having a discussion with Vangelis when I
suggested there was a distinction. I was wrong. I have not managed to
derive any reliable rule for distinguishing them. Sorry if I have caused
any confusion.
Best wishes
Richard